There is an attempt to interfere with the public protector, Thuli Madonsela's office said on Monday.
"The Public Protector, advocate Thuli Madonsela, has
noted with deep concern the extraordinary and unwarranted attacks on her
person and office by the ANC, the office of its Chief Whip in
Parliament, one of its alliance partners, and the leader of its women's
league following the unfortunate leak and publishing of her
confidential letter to President Jacob Zuma," spokeswoman Kgalalelo
Masibi said in a statement.
"Her reading of the public statements and comments
attributed to these parties is that there is an attempt to interfere
with the functioning of her office in violation of Section 181(4) of the
Constitution."
She said Madonsela called on the parties to respect the Constitution and allow her to do her job without fear or favour.
Madonsela reportedly wrote to Zuma recently that he was
second-guessing the recommendations she made following her
investigation into the R246 million spent on security upgrades to his
Nkandla, KwaZulu-Natal, homestead.
In her report, "Secure in Comfort", Madonsela
recommended Zuma repay money spent on upgrades not related to security,
such as the swimming pool, cattle kraal, amphitheatre, and visitors'
centre.
In his 20-page reply to her report, Zuma indicated
Police Minister Nathi Nhleko needed to determine if he should repay any
of the money spent on security upgrades at the homestead.
In response to Madonsela's leaked letter the African
National Congress's Chief Whip Stone Sizani said the public protector
should respect Parliament's handling of the Nkandla saga.
He said the report was before Parliament and an ad hoc committee, and that the legality of Madonsela's letter was questionable.
ANC spokesman Zizi Kodwa said the letter could be
interpreted as undermining the parliamentary process, and its authority
to process the matter.
The ANC called on the public protector to stop playing
to the gallery and allow other constitutional entities to fulfil their
role without interference and undue pressure.
Masibi on Monday said the public protector reiterated
that Zuma had not responded to her report or communicated any remedial
action. This was despite the presidency claiming he had.
"Nowhere in the purported response of the president to
the public protector's report does the document state that it
represents his comment on the report.
"In fact, in paragraph 7, the document in question
specifically states that it is 'not a critique' of the public
protector's report and that it 'offers no comment' on the contents of
the public protector's report and that this was not reflective of the
fact that the president was accepting the contents," she said.
Madonsela's office said she had indicated that if Zuma
had submitted a response to her report, she would leave the evaluation
of its adequacy to Parliament.
Nowhere in her letter to the president had Madonsela told Parliament what to do , said Masibi. (SAPA)
Follow us on Facebook:
PEFM 87.6
Follow us on Twitter:
@PEFMnews
International Correspondent Scott Congdon can be reached at:
Mail: scottcpefm@gmail.com
Phone: 010 500 8203 (in South Africa) (Available 3-5pm SAST weekdays)
011 27 10 500 8203 (calling from outside of South Africa) (Available 3-5pm SAST weekdays)
*Note: Views expressed in the commentaries on this website are those of individual authors and not necessarily those of PEFM 87.6or our presenters or correspondents. Quotes are obviously the opinion of the source. A quote is just a quote and these are offered without comment. Use of a news story or commentary is not an endorsement of the source website.
Follow us on Facebook:
PEFM 87.6
Follow us on Twitter:
@PEFMnews
International Correspondent Scott Congdon can be reached at:
Mail: scottcpefm@gmail.com
Phone: 010 500 8203 (in South Africa) (Available 3-5pm SAST weekdays)
011 27 10 500 8203 (calling from outside of South Africa) (Available 3-5pm SAST weekdays)
*Note: Views expressed in the commentaries on this website are those of individual authors and not necessarily those of PEFM 87.6or our presenters or correspondents. Quotes are obviously the opinion of the source. A quote is just a quote and these are offered without comment. Use of a news story or commentary is not an endorsement of the source website.
© PEFM 87.6
No comments:
Post a Comment